DNP Scholarly Project Deliverables
i. Project Report
A final DNP Scholarly Project Report will be completed and submitted to the agency along with an electronic format uploaded to the SPU Library Digital Commons. This report serves as written documentation of the completion of the Scholarly Project.
The following is an example of the Final DNP Scholarly Project Report format and can vary depending on the type of project. Students will review guidelines with their chair and ensure everyone on the project team understands the extent and detail needed under each topic.
Title page
Title
Name
A project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Nursing Practice
Seattle Pacific University, School of Health Sciences
Year
Executive Summary
(See criteria for Executive Summary in ii.)
Table of Contents
List of Tables
List of Figures
1) Introduction
Background and Significance
Problem Statement/Clinical Question
Review of Literature
Organization Assessment
Purpose of the Project
2) Conceptual and Theoretical Framework
3) Methodology
Setting
Participants
Recruitment Strategies
Intervention and Data Collection
Measures/Instruments/Tools
IRB
4) Analysis
5) Discussion
6) Limitations
7) Sustainability Plan
8) Implications for Practice
9) Conclusion
References
Appendix A
ii. Executive Summary
The executive summary provides an overview of the project. It is a condensed version of the report, usually around 2-pages in length. It includes:
- Title
- Background and Significance
- Problem and Purpose Statements
- Methods
- Results/Outcomes
- Sustainability
- Implications
- References
iii. Digital Poster & Presentation
Students will present their DNP Scholarly Projects to the DNP Scholarly Project Team and other stakeholders and guests at the beginning of Autumn quarter during Scholarship Day. This will take the form of a digital poster presentation of project findings as well as a concise oral presentation to the DNP Project team. The time allotted for the presentation is 15 minutes with 10 minutes for questions and answers.
All students are encouraged to use the SHS SPU Power Point Poster Template. Students opting to use a different layout should discuss with their faculty chair. Formatting must follow the guidelines listed below.
Formatting must include:
- The SPU logo
- Arial (minimum size 44) or Calibri (minimum size 48) font
- File name of (first initial)(last name) (digital poster) (year of presentation) (example: fnightingale digital poster 2019)
- All the following elements:
- Title
- Background and Significance
- Problem and Purpose Statements
- Methods
- Results/Outcomes
- Sustainability
- Implications
- References
iv. Journal Article Manuscript
Students will develop a faculty-approved manuscript ready for publication in a peer-reviewed professional journal. Submitting the manuscript for publication is not a graduation requirement.
Students will select an appropriate scholarly journal of their choice and develop a manuscript following the author guidelines as outlined by the selected journal. The focus of the article does not need to follow the DNP Scholarly Project Report format; students may select a different trajectory for the journal article manuscript such as an integrative review of the literature, state of the science, theory paper, methods paper, project summary, etc.
If the student and Chair decide to submit to a journal for publication, authorship should be listed with the following considerations.
- DNP student will be listed as the first author.
- DNP Scholarly Project Chair will assist the student to determine listing of authors.
- According to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors guidelines, “Authorship credit should be based on 1)substantial contributions to the conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and 3) final approval of the version to be published, and 4) agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.” (Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals.
- Each person listed as an author should meet all criteria, and all who qualify should be listed as authors.
School of Health Sciences, Seattle Pacific University